|
|
Post by macd on Feb 5, 2007 17:10:41 GMT
why no dee board- we have them for the spey, tay and tweed?  |
|
|
|
Post by williegunn on Feb 5, 2007 19:12:33 GMT
The big three
|
|
|
|
Post by duncanm on Feb 5, 2007 19:30:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sloggi on Feb 5, 2007 19:42:42 GMT
I thought the phrase was "the big four"? |
|
|
|
Post by williegunn on Feb 5, 2007 19:54:20 GMT
I thought the phrase was "the big four"? Only if the Dee is included without the Dee it's the big three, obviously. |
|
|
|
Post by Sloggi on Feb 5, 2007 20:06:27 GMT
Looking at the number of "Dee" threads, it would be a welcome development on the Forum if we followed the popular "Big Four" saying and added a new board. On the other hand we could easily end up with 25 rivers' boards  Perhaps the "Scottish Rivers" board could change to "other" Scottish Rivers |
|
|
|
Post by duncanm on Feb 5, 2007 20:25:22 GMT
I think he was asking why there was no individual Dee section in the river reports like there is for the Spey, Tay and Tweed. Ah, I see - sorry! |
|
|
|
Post by tyneandrew on Feb 5, 2007 21:20:47 GMT
Thanks for the link to the report, just spent about 2hrs reading it.
I was confused about the Dee board too if its any consolation!
|
|
|
|
Post by macd on Feb 6, 2007 20:41:06 GMT
i mean a board on here to go with the big three.  Ross |
|
betanut
Member
You should have been here yesterday....
Posts: 254
|
Post by betanut on Feb 6, 2007 21:17:35 GMT
Makes sense to me  |
|
|
|
Post by greenalert on Feb 26, 2007 19:09:51 GMT
And me
|
|
