tayspringer
Member
"IF YOU LINES NOT IN THE WATER, YOU CAN'T CATCH ONE OF THESE"! A TAY SPRINGER
Posts: 144
|
Post by tayspringer on Jan 27, 2007 11:04:46 GMT
THERE SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF DEBATE THESE DAYS WHERE THE JUNGLE cock EYES SHOULD BE ON A FLY ? Some advocate that they should be at the sides, 2 eyes on top 1 eye top and 1 bottom Any experts out there got the perfect position for JC eyes?
|
|
|
Post by granters on Jan 27, 2007 11:39:55 GMT
I'm no expert but i'm trying them on the arse of the fly as this is the part the fish sees most! just trying to think of a pattern that it'll work on just now
|
|
rennie
Member
If they cant see it they cant take it
Posts: 269
|
Post by rennie on Jan 27, 2007 11:49:15 GMT
Tubes and waddys in the bigger sizes try either side so they look like eyes,for smaller tubes(1" or smaller) and going to dressed hooks try a pair on top,depending on the patter en you are tying obviously.Maybe the clue is the bigger and more fishy the fly is going to be mount the jungle cock to look like eyes. Pedro.
|
|
|
Post by altmor on Jan 27, 2007 12:10:48 GMT
Or ... try the two JC eyes under the body. The theory being as seen in the photo, a small size 10 treble, used in summer, will usually swim above the fish, so the fish notice it from below, and with the added JC - I think makes it attractive to the fish and promotes aggression / a take. This is a Copper King and caught a good number for me last season.
|
|
tayspringer
Member
"IF YOU LINES NOT IN THE WATER, YOU CAN'T CATCH ONE OF THESE"! A TAY SPRINGER
Posts: 144
|
Post by tayspringer on Jan 27, 2007 13:18:51 GMT
I have tied top and bottom on this fly. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by altmor on Jan 27, 2007 14:07:39 GMT
Cracking fly, ... by the way, is that the right way up or is it upside down ? ;D
|
|
|
Post by lomond on Jan 28, 2007 18:43:15 GMT
Personally, I think it doesn't matter to the salmon if the fly has JC on it or not. I agree with springer that the profile and mobility is more important. I used both JC and non JC flies and can't say I catch more fish with JC flies. It may make the fly look better to the fisherman,but does the salmon think the same ?
|
|
|
Post by davewallbridge on Jan 28, 2007 19:03:59 GMT
Personally, I think it doesn't matter to the salmon if the fly has JC on it or not. I agree with springer that the profile and mobility is more important. ......... It may make the fly look better to the fisherman,but does the salmon think the same ? I agree. Recent discussion here : www.flyforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=7544Dave.
|
|
|
Post by jkboy on Jan 28, 2007 19:16:23 GMT
Although I put JC on many of my flies, to be honest I don't think it makes a BLIND bit of difference if a fly has no eyes! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by exerod on Jan 28, 2007 19:41:33 GMT
Anyway why do we call them jungle cock eyes. An eye is a black circle surrounded by a white or coloured ring, the exact opposite of a jungle cock feather.
Andy
|
|
|
Post by easky on Jan 29, 2007 11:24:04 GMT
I tend to tie them on Irish Shrimp patterns, I tie then roofed and at the sides so that they show from below the fly. I think one theory is that in this format they are supposed to be like egg sacks on a shrimp. I have never looked at a real shrimp that close but it does seem to make sense . I also tie some bigger and hairwind patterns with the JC on the sides to replicate eyes. So I think there are at least 2 different uses for it. E
|
|
|
Post by Sloggi on Jan 29, 2007 17:17:59 GMT
In the "6 flies for the season" thread we had the Cascade as the no.1 fly - no JC Neither does an Ally's Shrimp or a Ness C - two other very popular flies.
|
|